From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-89433-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 29230 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2012 18:01:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 29212 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2012 18:01:08 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL,TW_XG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:00:54 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M1P00200LTFYJ00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:00:52 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.100.223]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M1P00224M1EY940@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:00:52 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:01:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: set print object on should affect MI varobjs (PR mi/13393)
In-reply-to: <4F6CADEF.4080700@yandex.ru>
To: xgsa <xgsa@yandex.ru>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83vclmynmz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4ED92C05.9080803@yandex.ru> <m3mxanjiy0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4EF22A4D.80703@yandex.ru> <20111221193630.GA28985@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4EF30389.5010008@yandex.ru> <20111223200951.GA19581@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4EF5D1C5.5010902@yandex.ru> <20120102022153.GA686@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F07177C.5080201@yandex.ru> <m38vkfljq5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F32C009.2050103@yandex.ru> <87pqdma1mo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F412637.2010405@yandex.ru> <4F660CF6.9070008@yandex.ru> <8339953anu.fsf@gnu.org> <4F66DBD0.4000903@yandex.ru> <83vcm01obe.fsf@gnu.org> <4F6CADEF.4080700@yandex.ru>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg01055.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:07:59 +0200
> From: xgsa <xgsa@yandex.ru>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org

Sorry for a long response time.

> +would be printed by the @value{GDBN} CLI.  Note that if 
> +@samp{set print object} setting is set the @emph{actual} (derived) type
> +of the object is set rather than @emph{declared} one.

"setting is set" is not right.  I actually don't understand what you
tried to say; if you explain your intent, I will suggest a better
wording.

> +The type of the child. Note that if @samp{set print object} setting is
                        ^^
Two spaces here, please.

> +set the @emph{actual} (derived) type of the object is set rather than
> +@emph{declared} one.

Here you have the same problem as above ("setting is set" and
generally unclear intent).

Thanks.