From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1732 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2012 20:39:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 1710 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Dec 2012 20:39:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:39:12 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEV00300VZHUV00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:39:07 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEV003RFW17F0B0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:39:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:39:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [doc patchv2] coding style: 0 vs. NULL + [patch] Code cleanup: skip.c In-reply-to: <20121211202228.GA12984@host2.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ratmice@gmail.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83vcc88gt5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20121210184220.GA29321@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121211015343.GM31477@adacore.com> <20121211060641.GA7775@host2.jankratochvil.net> <50C7093F.5000600@redhat.com> <20121211120057.GO31477@adacore.com> <20121211202228.GA12984@host2.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00359.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:22:28 +0100 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Matt Rice > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:00:57 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Same here. I tend to prefer explicit checks. > > OK, updated. > > > Thanks, > Jan > > > gdb/doc/ > 2012-12-11 Jan Kratochvil > > * gdbint.texinfo (Coding Standards) (C Usage): New rule for 0 vs. NULL. Okayed -- under protest, because I happen to think that if (!pointer) is perfectly valid C. Thanks.