From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32148 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2013 17:13:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32105 invoked by uid 89); 20 Mar 2013 17:13:10 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:13:07 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MJY00C00YGEVY00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:13:03 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MJY00CU6YHRH3A0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:13:03 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:20:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: one week to gdb-7.6 release? In-reply-to: <20130320160032.GC5447@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, palves@redhat.com, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, ralf.corsepius@rtems.org, vapier@gentoo.org, joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83vc8myoyb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20130320160032.GC5447@adacore.com> X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00753.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:00:32 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: Pedro Alves , Jan Kratochvil , Ralf Corsepius , Mike Frysinger , Joel Sherrill > > We're about one week away from our tentative date for gdb-7.6 release, > and I was wondering how we are doing, and whether there might be > some issues that might prevent us from releasing around our planned > date. > > I know of: > > * PR/15289 set remote hardware-watchpoint-limit" broken (zinteger commands) > (regression) > Easy to fix, or just revert the patch that caused the regression? > > * dv-sockser.o build issues in the sim. > Looks like the thread lost steam a bit - can we stoke the fire again? I'd like my patch that deals with relocation to be committed to the branch. I don't see it in the list archives, so cannot show a URL, but Jan send a few comments that I want to incorporate and submit tomorrow.