From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10241 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2013 17:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10226 invoked by uid 89); 29 Mar 2013 17:18:22 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:18:17 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MKF00700MP3ZK00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:18:14 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MKF0079QMQEZM00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:18:14 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:39:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Add annex in a async remote notification. In-reply-to: <5155BEAC.7090401@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83vc8a3z0z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1358838232-13319-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1358838232-13319-2-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83fw1tod6e.fsf@gnu.org> <511EFE76.4030506@codesourcery.com> <83621ssj6n.fsf@gnu.org> <5155BEAC.7090401@codesourcery.com> X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg01125.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 00:17:48 +0800 > From: Yao Qi > CC: > > Patch 2/5 (Query supported notifications by qSupported) is to address > this issue. When GDB connects to the remote stub, they will exchange > the supported annexes. As a result, the new form "name:annex:event" > shouldn't be sent out if the other side doesn't support it. Does it > answer your question? Yes, thanks.