From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4603 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2014 17:10:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4577 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2014 17:10:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:10:35 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NB800F00FMSR900@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:10:32 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NB800FRDFPK6080@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:10:32 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:10:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH][PR guile/17247] Block SIGCHLD while initializing Guile In-reply-to: <87r3zv71qy.fsf@gnu.org> To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83vbp7fer3.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT References: <834mwsh2nu.fsf@gnu.org> <8338ccgj78.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppffabw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4u3flr2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3zv71qy.fsf@gnu.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 > From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 18:18:45 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii skribis: > > > Perhaps we should request GC and Guile to provide capabilities to > > disable threads at run time, then. > > I don’t think we need to go this far: reading the recent discussions, it > seems Doug found a way to make sure Guile’s and libgc’s internal threads > don’t receive signals that GDB is interested in, which should be enough > for practical purposes. That's just the tip of an iceberg, I'm afraid.