From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7810 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2017 17:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7800 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2017 17:42:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Thats, That's, Hx-languages-length:636 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 17:42:36 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Fav-0000UH-Va for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:42:34 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Fav-0000UD-S4; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:42:29 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4281 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e1Fav-0000Va-9f; Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:42:29 -0400 Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 17:42:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83vajpsfi6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Simon Marchi on Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:20:28 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't try building gdb against guile-2.2 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20171008164703.12953-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <83y3olsgty.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00169.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2017 13:20:28 -0400 > From: Simon Marchi > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > Should we perhaps have a configure-time option, by default off, to use > > Guile 2.2? Otherwise, how would that "somebody" work on fixing this > > problem, if they cannot even try building with Guile 2.2? > > > > Thanks. > > They can pass --with-guile=guile-2.2. try_guile_versions, AFAIU, > contains the version to try by default if the version to use is not > explicitly passed (--with-guile or --with-guile=yes). Ah, okay. That's good enough, I think.