Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] [AArch64] MTE corefile support
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:30:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83v8v1plkl.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f46481d7-0eef-7433-711c-f969a6bcb202@arm.com> (message from Luis Machado on Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:12:44 +0100)

> Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:12:44 +0100
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
> 
> >>   *** Changes since GDB 12
> >>   
> >> +* GDB now supports dumping memory tag data for AArch64 MTE.  It also supports
> >> +  reading memory tag data for AArch64 MTE from core files generated by
> >> +  the gcore command or the Linux kernel.
> >> +
> > 
> > I think this should say something about the significance of this
> > feature.  Otherwise it is completely unclear why would GDB want to
> > support that.
> > 
> > Same comment for the addition to the manual.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> It is a bit short. How about the following additional paragraph?
> 
> "When a process uses memory-mapped pages protected by memory tags (for 
> example, AArch64 MTE), this additional information will be recorded in 
> the core file in the event of a crash or if GDB generates a core file 
> from the current process state.
> 
> The memory tag data will be used so developers can display the memory 
> tags from a particular memory region, and will also be used to show a 
> detailed message about a crash that happened due to a memory tag violation."

This is fine, but can what's described in the last paragraph be done
by GDB commands, or does it require external tools?  In the former
case, we should mention those GDB commands; in the latter case I'd
settle for mentioning the fact that external tools are required.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-31 14:03 Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-04-21 15:20 ` [PATCH, v2] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-04-21 15:52   ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2022-04-22  8:12     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-04-22  8:30       ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches [this message]
2022-04-22  8:37         ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-04-22  8:43           ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2022-04-22  8:44             ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-04-22 13:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-04-22 13:33   ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2022-04-22 13:30 ` [PATCH, v3] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-05-03 21:56 ` [PATCH, v4] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-05-12 10:36   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-05-18 12:46   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-05-18 13:58     ` John Baldwin
2022-05-23  9:50       ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-05-23  9:49     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-06-06  9:28   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-06-06  9:42     ` Kuan-Ying Lee via Gdb-patches
2022-06-06  9:47       ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-06-06  9:54         ` Kuan-Ying Lee via Gdb-patches
2022-06-06 10:49     ` Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches
2022-06-22  9:04   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-06-27 14:51   ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-11 10:13     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-07-11 10:57   ` [PATCH] [AArch64,v5] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-07-18 13:54     ` Pedro Alves
2022-07-19 14:25       ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-18 20:20 [PATCH] [AArch64] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-05-26 14:08 ` [PATCH,v2] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-05-29  3:14   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-05-31 14:12     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2021-05-31 14:49       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-05-31 14:56         ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83v8v1plkl.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox