From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 14MYEaIAlmJHdQkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:48:50 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 3564D1E221; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:48:50 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=OouU+TTK; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2E931E00D for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:48:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF1A3836661 for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 11:48:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4CF1A3836661 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1653997729; bh=E2mIV8W8YlvAt0ZaqCLh01AcRtGq1l4OA+e4ZtZ+Mo8=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=OouU+TTK+DxyOnvwwOYWjDN8mxt9ZLaGX+HCRmIyHntCzk/m0dGUYUtmNC6pGExem OyQUM0dC9WRzFrw4UBR3DB1JmZ+3nVoMsR7foSWtEwD1+oq2Mpiux222QqTZ8aWMTf J68KMh2ai+e8Y140E163KArELb/51qdVe8Q2k5io= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A6A38356B3 for ; Tue, 31 May 2022 11:47:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 29A6A38356B3 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw0LC-0007Cy-I7; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:47:14 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3230 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nw0LA-0003zJ-Il; Tue, 31 May 2022 07:47:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 14:47:17 +0300 Message-Id: <83v8tlj54q.fsf@gnu.org> To: Pedro Alves In-Reply-To: <329dd3bc-4a76-873c-006e-4e07aadc8d3c@palves.net> (message from Pedro Alves on Tue, 31 May 2022 12:13:54 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Explicitly mention yet-unloaded shared libraries in location spec examples References: <20220526194250.2310460-1-pedro@palves.net> <838rqmm7gb.fsf@gnu.org> <6914f754-4e33-5aa1-4ea6-dca9504e8bfe@palves.net> <837d63j8tx.fsf@gnu.org> <329dd3bc-4a76-873c-006e-4e07aadc8d3c@palves.net> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 12:13:54 +0100 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > > > Shouldn't this mention explicitly the frequent situation where the > > location specifies something in a yet-unloaded shared library? > > > > Maybe. How about this. LGTM, thanks.