From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id qctlHcyigGTnnyAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 11:31:24 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 6B63C1E128; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:31:24 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=nA6ZESIM; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 080A61E0D6 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 11:31:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770393857737 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 15:31:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 770393857737 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1686151883; bh=2T1WlxfdOdWcDjVweg3sJZLJNSdBQq8oZMykscX+S/U=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=nA6ZESIMDpLBvXSM2fDpf7g+0KaiILU9xCgyGX2OcLIHlKoWjGlGvRy6tsUSzepBE WS6QMjdd+YhAV8b2eiYeK2onoUD4fuhR2ks2+NDo7Fk+6Hnb/9huUd6TaxFcecAUOy XxucW/MPrwObvxHYfpLluSi98oHsUbFVmV+0ZD9U= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 799AE3858C54 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 15:31:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 799AE3858C54 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q6v7o-0008RG-4Q; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 11:31:04 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q6v7n-0008Ec-Dk; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 11:31:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 18:31:07 +0300 Message-Id: <83v8fz2ssk.fsf@gnu.org> To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87jzwf1h21.fsf@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Burgess on Wed, 07 Jun 2023 15:29:58 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 6/6] gdb: rename unwindonsignal to unwind-on-signal References: <834jnj4f7c.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzwf1h21.fsf@redhat.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Andrew Burgess > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 15:29:58 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > If the only changes in the documentation are mechanical renaming, can > > I blindly approve the documentation part? Or would you prefer a real > > review? > > Eli, > > Apologies, I forgot to add text to these emails to indicate that you > have already approved all of the doc changes: > > [6/6] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-January/195874.html > [5/6] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-January/195873.html > [3/6] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-January/196462.html OK, great. > Sorry for wasting your time here. You didn't waste any of my time, I asked before investing any effort in a review. No sweat, really. > I'm going to go though and add your reviewed-by tag to each commit > message now. I should have done this much sooner. Thanks.