From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id QHCaLRS5omSdlRQAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:03:32 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ReUgHZHQ; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id B70261E0BB; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 08:03:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A53291E00F for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 08:03:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263953858281 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 12:03:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 263953858281 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1688385810; bh=hkyus1sHbd3Rp6QmvUwpa2UFcm1FpOMp6wFWkIUJJ+I=; h=Date:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=ReUgHZHQGOyLkgNfdTamZta6Fs/mrUujeIx42zG6P3OalbGT5MaEh2qHbSz2c8Gef uzFiZTtcskyxz0c31LQL1F4ktR4mMROj8AmarRluDKDUG5SSOVS4SF5XuGFgtPAYzD dGo8MuXHbd9+4sXZLizQ5qlVJm2xSLpf0KGYWrd0= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D733858D1E for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 12:03:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B0D733858D1E Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGIGq-0003KR-T1; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:03:08 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGIGo-0001lG-Kh; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:03:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 15:03:43 +0300 Message-Id: <83v8f1mcbk.fsf@gnu.org> To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <8eaf8d52-3814-bf9c-2c4b-dc2b5b0eae62@arm.com> (message from Luis Machado on Mon, 3 Jul 2023 10:52:34 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] [gdb/docs] sme: Document SME registers and features References: <20230630134616.1238105-1-luis.machado@arm.com> <20230630134616.1238105-17-luis.machado@arm.com> <83fs68qa7x.fsf@gnu.org> <8eaf8d52-3814-bf9c-2c4b-dc2b5b0eae62@arm.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 10:52:34 +0100 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Luis Machado > > > Please use @command{gdbserver} instead of @code. > > > > Is this the convention? I see 123 matches for @code{gdbserver}, but only 32 for > @command{gdbserver}. It's a convention, but it is relatively recent, and I didn't see a need to convert all of the existing uses of @code to mean a program (although such a patch will be welcome, if someone wants to do it).