From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: parallelize "make check"
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:53:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83tz23zdsz.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3tz24f4iw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:21:43 -0600
>
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> Eli> It would be good to mention this possibility in README, IMO.
>
> Please review.
Thanks. A couple of comments:
. You mention RUNTESTFLAGS that is not otherwise documented in
README. I understand that you mention it (and the solution via
setting RUNTESTFLAGS) as ``gotcha'' for those who use this variable
for reasons unrelated to -j. If so, I would suggest to make it an
explicit note, something like this (the parens are deliberate):
(Note that setting `RUNTESTFLAGS' then, by default, the tests will
be run serially even under -j. You can override this and force a
parallel run ...)
. I think we should say that using -j significantly cuts the time for
running the test suite. Otherwise, the reader would not
necessarily understand why she would like to use -j.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-26 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 19:27 Tom Tromey
2009-06-25 3:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-25 20:21 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-26 6:53 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2009-06-26 15:56 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-27 9:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-25 14:55 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-25 15:09 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-25 22:58 ` Pedro Alves
2009-06-26 1:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-26 17:45 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-26 20:27 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-26 23:41 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-06-29 16:43 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-29 16:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-29 18:05 ` Tom Tromey
2009-06-29 18:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-29 21:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2009-07-01 12:06 ` [patch] testsuite: Fix multiple runs in parallel on a single host [Re: RFC: parallelize "make check"] Jan Kratochvil
2009-07-06 18:39 ` Tom Tromey
2009-07-06 18:53 ` [patch] testsuite: Fix multiple runs in parallel on a single host Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83tz23zdsz.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox