From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-65856-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22459 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2009 17:51:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 22451 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2009 17:51:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout7.012.net.il (HELO mtaout7.012.net.il) (84.95.2.19)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:51:05 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout7.012.net.il by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KNV002005J2SO00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:50:37 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.149.138]) by i-mtaout7.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KNV0028B5K9AS00@i-mtaout7.012.net.il>; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:50:34 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:51:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] util.c + doc [was Re: [RFC] Queries and frontends]
In-reply-to: <19064.2410.863604.37792@totara.tehura.co.nz>
To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts)
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, marc.khouzam@ericsson.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83tz0no4d3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <6D19CA8D71C89C43A057926FE0D4ADAA07C00023@ecamlmw720.eamcs.ericsson.se> <19045.23703.743876.775308@totara.tehura.co.nz> <m37hxwm3wr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <19053.2107.342469.683795@totara.tehura.co.nz> <m3iqheje2p.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <19054.23189.193878.534661@totara.tehura.co.nz> <m3r5vztcpw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <19056.57733.247579.68268@totara.tehura.co.nz> <83zlamsw22.fsf@gnu.org> <19064.2410.863604.37792@totara.tehura.co.nz>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:11:54 +1200
> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, marc.khouzam@ericsson.com, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts)
> 
>  > "value of `show confirm' command" sounds awkward (a command cannot
>  > have a value).  Can you suggest a better wording?
> 
> Perhaps it's enough to say that they are disabled and point to the existing
> description.
> [...]
> + It also disables confirmation requests (@pxref{confirmation requests}).

Yes, that's good, but the sentence is too far from the first paragraph
of this section to make "It" self-explanatory.  How about the variant
below?

 The @code{server } prefix also disables confirmation requests
 (@pxref{confirmation requests}).