From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-67240-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18374 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2009 13:12:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 18359 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2009 13:12:06 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:12:00 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KQK00500XZOAH00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:11:57 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.56.156]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KQK003LSXZUKL00@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:11:54 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:12:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: FYI: use UTF-16 and UTF-32, not UCS-2 and UCS-4
In-reply-to: <000001ca3ea0$6248fb40$26daf1c0$@u-strasbg.fr>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83tyypsvai.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m363b6yczm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <837hvmt6tr.fsf@gnu.org> <000001ca3ea0$6248fb40$26daf1c0$@u-strasbg.fr>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00835.txt.bz2

> From: "Pierre Muller" <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
> Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:56:27 +0200
> 
>   If that feature was added since last release,
> it would mean that we would use "UCS" as default in 7.0 only, 
> is that a good thing?
> 
>   On 7.1 release, users might complain about a
> new feature introduced in 7.0 
> and already changed in 7.1...

I don't see why someone would complain.  This is an internal
implementation detail that is not exposed to users, right?