From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-71822-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26447 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2010 17:34:15 -0000
Received: (qmail 26415 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2010 17:34:08 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:34:03 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0I00D00OQD8R00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:33:48 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0I00B4YOS98N70@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 20:33:46 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:34:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix for Go32-v2 native woes
In-reply-to: <20100407144132.GA30700@caradoc.them.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Cc: hjl.tools@gmail.com, pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83tyrnw4jg.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <002a01cad517$d36eab90$7a4c02b0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <001801cad593$8e70daf0$ab5290d0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <83iq84xyoa.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6h0vtj6.fsf@gnu.org> <i2u6dc9ffc81004062319l66c2045oebce4cc3eb095cb4@mail.gmail.com> <E1NzOzi-0004wW-Dz@fencepost.gnu.org> <20100407144132.GA30700@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00141.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:41:37 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
> Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr,
> 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > Btw, what happens with the register-related features you added if
> > libexpat is not linked in?  Do these features silently disappear
> > (good) or break the build (bad) or cause fatal internal errors at run
> > time (worse)?
> 
> They continue to work (even better).  We parse the XML files used for
> native debugging into C files, and the generated C files are stored in
> the source tree.  This was a design requirement before we could
> require XML descriptions for any native platform.

Thanks.  So this means we currently assume SSE support regardless of
the XML files, is that right?