From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-84271-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10086 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2011 16:09:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 10073 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2011 16:09:00 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,T_FRT_CLICK
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:08:39 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LSU00000Y212300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:08:37 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.91.138]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LSU00M1BY6BMN80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:08:36 +0200 (IST)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:09:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] New test+use texinfo @click - @HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK@  [Re: doc build failure (Re: [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames)]
In-reply-to: <201110101615.39047.pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, uweigand@de.ibm.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83ty7gygl7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <E1RDGIs-0005T4-Eo@fencepost.gnu.org> <201110101357.p9ADvmvK012977@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20111010145749.GA9444@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201110101615.39047.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2

> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:15:38 +0100
> Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
>  Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>,
>  eliz@gnu.org
> 
> On Monday 10 October 2011 15:57:49, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > +@ifset HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK
> > +The code can have possible execution paths
> > +@clicksequence{main@click{}a@click{}b@click{}c@click{}d@click{}f} or
> > +@clicksequence{main@click{}a@click{}b@click{}e@click{}f}, @value{GDBN} cannot find which
> >  one from the inferior state.
> > +@end ifset
> 
> Leaving a piece of the manual out like that is not okay.

I agree.

> If this feature is too new for the currently required makeinfo
> version (which is it, btw?), we have two real choices:
> 
>  1. bump the minimum required makeinfo version so we can use it
>  2. don't use the new feature

I don't want to do (1), because 4.8 is not too old relatively to 4.12,
and many people still use it.  OTOH, there's nothing wrong with using
ASCII art in this case.

Jan, how strong are your feelings about using @arrow or @click?