From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6727 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2012 15:09:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 6715 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Sep 2012 15:09:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_NIX_SPAM,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:09:03 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAU00600ZRG0H00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:08:32 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAV0060F0Q76A20@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:08:32 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:09:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Try to initialize data-directory by first searching for "data-directory" in the same directory as the gdb binary In-reply-to: <20120924145910.GE4146@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: khooyp@cs.umd.edu, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83txunihli.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21ACC598-F6B4-4117-BA7B-B316414DE9E3@cs.umd.edu> <20120919130040.GA20442@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120921183122.GB8747@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120922110822.GA28159@host2.jankratochvil.net> <78B3333C-92F9-474D-8352-087C5A0F575B@cs.umd.edu> <20120924072945.GA4146@adacore.com> <20120924145910.GE4146@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:59:10 +0200 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: Jan Kratochvil , GDB Patches > > As far as I could tell, Jan and yourself were discussing two patches > that should work. You like neither of them, but short of having > a solution that either of you likes, why not just commit one of them? > As long as we take the build data-directory as a fallback over a non- > existant standard (configured/possibly relocated) data-directory, > I don't see a problem. Agreed.