From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20257 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2012 07:26:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 20228 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2012 07:26:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:26:09 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MD700G00LSOQE00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:26:07 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MD700GPZLZJNA80@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:26:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 07:26:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA/doco] document gdb.init check only performed in home directory In-reply-to: <20121108222739.GO5103@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83txszz17v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1352411767-10263-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <83y5ibzr1c.fsf@gnu.org> <20121108222739.GO5103@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 14:27:39 -0800 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > > gdb/doc/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * gdb.texinfo (Startup): Clarify scope of gdb.ini warning for > > > Windows ports. > > > > > > Tested on x86_64-linux. OK to apply? > > > > Yes, thanks. However, I would suggest to lose the plural form, and > > just use "The Windows port" in singular. A GDB user who uses GDB on > > Windows only cares about that one port she is using. > > Thanks! Attached is the patch I checked in, after incorporating > your suggestion. I agree it sounds more natural... Great, this can go in, then.