From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15458 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2012 15:39:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 15448 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2012 15:39:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:38:56 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MDL00E007FS3900@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:38:54 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MDL00DJX7GTMC90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:38:54 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:39:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [10/10] RFC: remove gdb_wait.h In-reply-to: <20121116144523.GK3790@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83txsp4ky9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87wqxmwthq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83wqxmsi32.fsf@gnu.org> <20121115210828.GG3790@adacore.com> <83txsqrmfu.fsf@gnu.org> <20121116144523.GK3790@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00461.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:45:23 -0800 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > With my previous Windows-related contribution to gnulib collecting > > dust since January, without any reason (the RM agreed that the code > > was correct and should be admitted), why would I bother to submit > > another one? > > I'm very sorry to hear that you've had problems submitting one patch. > But I hope you're not going to let that discourage you. I'm waiting for the patch to be committed, at which time I will decide if I'm discouraged enough to continue submitting to gnulib. > We are not without our own hicups too, and hopefully they are only > occasional, and can be taken care of with a few pings. You can see my pings here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-06/msg00222.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-07/msg00004.html Sorry, I cannot consider this a "hiccup".