From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-104050-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19339 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2013 14:54:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 19330 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2013 14:54:10 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1
Received: from Unknown (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:54:09 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MR200F00C13IJ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 17:54:00 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MR200FQTC20EV20@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 17:54:00 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:54:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: gdbserver allows for subsequent and not for additional connections.
In-reply-to: <1375694633-30275-1-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
To: Sanimir Agovic <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83txj4w5m7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1375694633-30275-1-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2

> From: Sanimir Agovic <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Mon,  5 Aug 2013 11:23:53 +0200
> 
> Reading the gdb documentation about TCP port allocation lifecycle I had the
> impression that gdbserver allows multiple connection, which it does not. Thus
> the term "subsequent" suites better than "additional".
> 
> old> By default, gdbserver keeps the listening TCP port open, so that
> additional connections are possible.
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> new> By default, gdbserver keeps the listening TCP port open, so that
> subsequent connections are possible.
> ^^^^^^^^^^

Is it really such a significant difference?  I'm not sure.

Thanks.