From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-107733-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11758 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2013 11:12:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 11742 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2013 11:12:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il
Received: from Unknown (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:12:30 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MX000500V3QF900@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:12:20 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MX0005IKV4JDB30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:12:20 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:09:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation for MPX.
In-reply-to: <AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B191B1DDEA5@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>
To: "Tedeschi, Walfred" <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
Cc: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83txev7985.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1385636042-10592-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <83mwko8ev7.fsf@gnu.org> <AC542571535E904D8E8ADAE745D60B191B1DDEA5@IRSMSX104.ger.corp.intel.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00900.txt.bz2

> From: "Tedeschi, Walfred" <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com>
> CC: "palves@redhat.com" <palves@redhat.com>, "gdb-patches@sourceware.org"
> 	<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 09:41:39 +0000
> 
> About the "Architecture": You have made a comment on another place about Raw values/Architecture values. That was changed. The line is this one:
>      +This way the raw value can be accessed via bnd0raw@dots{}bnd3raw.  Any 
>      +change on bnd0@dots{}bnd3 or bnd0raw@dots{}bnd3raw is reflect on its 
>      +counterpart.
> Before:
>     +This way the architecture value can be accessed via bnd0raw...bnd3raw.   
>     +Any change on bnd0..bnd3 or bnd0raw...bnd3raw is reflect on its 
>     +counterpart.  When displaying

OK, but I meant to use "raw" everywhere, not just in that part.

> I will add here a list of changes in V2:
> 1. Added @cindex for MPX and @def for MPX.
> 2.Exchanged "..." by @dots{}
> 3.Fix typo on "Architecture registers...." as mentioned.
> 4.Example is fixed (using "@{"  for "{" and  "@}" for "}").

Right.

> About the phrase:
> >+Architecture registers @samp{BND0} through @samp{BND3} are 
> > +represented in @value{GDBN} as @samp{bnd0raw} through @samp{bnd3raw}. 
> 
> My intention was to emphasize that the BND register, as presented on Intel manual, is represented in GDB by bndraw.  Therefore the use of " Architecture registers".
> Since we have already defined that BND are the architecture register we could omit the "Architecture Registers on the phrase writing like:
> 
> >+@samp{BND0} through @samp{BND3} are 
> > +represented in @value{GDBN} as @samp{bnd0raw} through @samp{bnd3raw}.
> 
> What do you think?

Fine with me, thanks.