From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110414 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2015 18:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 110403 invoked by uid 89); 10 Apr 2015 18:16:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout25.012.net.il Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il (HELO mtaout25.012.net.il) (80.179.55.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:16:38 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NML00C00RFRZ400@mtaout25.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 21:12:02 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NML006WXRW23P70@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 21:12:02 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:16:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Support reading/writing memory on architectures with non 8-bits bytes In-reply-to: <55281004.8040105@ericsson.com> To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83twwnsvaz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1428522979-28709-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <83d23dg1bd.fsf@gnu.org> <55269D1A.3080902@ericsson.com> <83vbh5e04f.fsf@gnu.org> <5526E87D.3020109@ericsson.com> <838ue0v1vy.fsf@gnu.org> <5527F3BC.3030005@ericsson.com> <831tjrubgy.fsf@gnu.org> <55281004.8040105@ericsson.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:01:40 -0400 > From: Simon Marchi > CC: > > > We could use the terminology that is already in use: "half-words" for > > 16 bits and "words" for 32 bits. Would that be OK? > > When you know what is the size of the data unit you are referring to that's fine. But > we need another word or expression for when we don't know it. "Addressable memory unit" sounds good to me, provided that we explain somewhere what that means.