From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-128030-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 67080 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2015 16:37:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 67070 invoked by uid 89); 10 Dec 2015 16:37:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mtaout29.012.net.il
Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il (HELO mtaout29.012.net.il) (80.179.55.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:37:52 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ500600I4NIF00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:37:59 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ5003UII7AAD20@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:37:59 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:37:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [gdb/doc] There's always a thread
In-reply-to: <1449756899-18063-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83twnq9s4d.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1449756899-18063-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2

> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:14:59 +0000
> 
> This warning is a few years out of date -- there's always a thread
> nowadays.
> 
> gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* gdb.texinfo (Threads): Replace warning with explanation/example
> 	about single-threaded programs.

This is OK, but your particular wording makes it sound like systems
that have no threading libraries at all are not covered by the
description.  How about not mentioning the threading library and the
rest of confusing details, and instead just talk about single-threaded
programs?

Thanks.