From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13333 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2016 09:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13322 invoked by uid 89); 26 Aug 2016 09:07:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:656 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:07:26 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdD6i-0001PC-Cz for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 05:07:25 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bdD6b-0001Oo-Bk; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 05:07:17 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3666 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bdD6Z-0004mo-Ci; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 05:07:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83twe7dhk7.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Jan Kratochvil CC: arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, palves@redhat.com In-reply-to: <20160826090148.GA27461@host1.jankratochvil.net> (message from Jan Kratochvil on Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:01:48 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Avoid designated inits, for C++ compliance Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20160826090148.GA27461@host1.jankratochvil.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:01:48 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves > > > [1:text/plain Hide] > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:56:25 +0200, Andreas Arnez wrote: > > C++ does not officially support designators in initializer lists. > > I could miss something about the transition to C++ but C++ was not intended to > make the sources worse, it should improve the sources. The checked in change > makes the source apparently more error prone to future changes. Why not the > attached? Because it's C++, not C?