From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22334 invoked by alias); 20 May 2017 07:49:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22263 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2017 07:49:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 May 2017 07:49:12 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBz8Q-0000Ua-Li for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 20 May 2017 03:49:13 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBz8Q-0000UW-Ic; Sat, 20 May 2017 03:49:10 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1294 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dBz8P-0001Ac-GZ; Sat, 20 May 2017 03:49:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 07:49:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83tw4g0xzx.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: DJ Delorie CC: palves@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from DJ Delorie on Sat, 20 May 2017 02:16:14 -0400) Subject: Re: MinGW compilation warnings in libiberty's include/environ.h Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00481.txt.bz2 > From: DJ Delorie > Cc: palves@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 02:16:14 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > My problem is, I don't have a GCC repository, so doing the above means > > In this case, a gdb repo would have sufficed. Thanks, I didn't know that.