From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 110689 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2017 18:32:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 110655 invoked by uid 89); 3 Oct 2017 18:32:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 18:32:55 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzRzu-0002Us-2v for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:32:54 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38631) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzRzt-0002UI-Vq; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:32:50 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3131 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dzRzr-00034a-Bm; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:32:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 18:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83tvzgytdx.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves CC: roirand@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <81b6ce9e-1ee0-1c60-81d4-869f7a9d6b5e@redhat.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:15:39 +0100) Subject: Re: [RFA v3] enable/disable sub breakpoint range Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <83lgks1e1h.fsf@gnu.org> <834lrg198u.fsf@gnu.org> <815a1576-6a07-6a40-e887-9d886c4ada6c@redhat.com> <83zi98yxnr.fsf@gnu.org> <81b6ce9e-1ee0-1c60-81d4-869f7a9d6b5e@redhat.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 > Cc: roirand@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:15:39 +0100 > > > Wouldn't it be better to use 1.3-1.5 for the subranges, and then we > > could still say 1.3-5 to mean all the breakpoints between 1.3 and 5? > > IMO, I'd rather not treat treat locations as decimals. Fair enough. Let me just say that, as a user, the notion that 1.3-5 actually 'expands" into "1.3 1.4 1.5" is extremely surprising, as that's not what I'm used to in other similar situations. But maybe I'm just the odd one out.