From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 128384 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2019 16:46:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 124487 invoked by uid 89); 26 Feb 2019 16:46:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:657 X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:46:37 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyfsJ-0005sY-5K; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:46:35 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1398 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gyfsI-000677-G9; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:46:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:46:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83tvgqlcp4.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <8736oaldss.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:22:59 -0700) Subject: Re: [RFC 00/17] Merge event loop implementations References: <20190224165153.5062-1-tom@tromey.com> <83sgwdnm6r.fsf@gnu.org> <87va19jdy4.fsf@tromey.com> <83r2bxnkrb.fsf@gnu.org> <87imx7vdxe.fsf@tromey.com> <83lg23mx18.fsf@gnu.org> <87o96ztwpa.fsf@tromey.com> <83y362lenr.fsf@gnu.org> <8736oaldss.fsf@tromey.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-02/txt/msg00439.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:22:59 -0700 > > Yes, that sounds quite nice. I have a patch to update gnulib and to add > new gnulib modules for most of these things (I forgot to do 'bind' but > that's easily rectified). I can write the change to remove the relevant > USE_WIN32API bits -- but I can only build it, not test it. If I send a > patch can you give it a try? Yes, although it might take some time. For testing, I guess I should go through testsuite/gdb.server and run at least some of that manually?