From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id YbdbCicUVGL9KAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 07:42:31 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1944A1F202; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 07:42:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1801E150 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 07:42:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B92C3856259 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:42:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2B92C3856259 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1649677350; bh=ceo+O3U/fvruvURtRvLAlbhjC+aDHfl2rVIvXiXO4c4=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=DWeMYlDwY9P9rf2a7XbKh6LiBj3GhlmvoQJMTRRsfIY7AExxGZuJFdpJHGuxxEO8E lSymazcCSdXv3cL/EUIMQ93tEyuxWwMn4SHKGIrZN/PjVyjZ1mMfzM1ziyJZNs0pGk H15ziAaHrcznUeGXuV0V3nsg1R3nMWNlwHetoQjs= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BD4B3858D1E for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 11:42:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2BD4B3858D1E Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndsQr-00046B-BE; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 07:42:09 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1356 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ndsQq-0006N7-NQ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 07:42:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 14:42:10 +0300 Message-Id: <83tuaz6e3x.fsf@gnu.org> To: Joel Brobecker In-Reply-To: (message from Joel Brobecker on Sun, 10 Apr 2022 12:06:52 -0700) Subject: Re: GDB 12.0.90 available for testing References: <83fsmx59wi.fsf@gnu.org> <83ee2h59m2.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmm096dc.fsf@redhat.com> <83zgl44w1m.fsf@gnu.org> <1379565857.1750775.1648990951974@mail.yahoo.com> <1113857996.1779276.1648999598328@mail.yahoo.com> <83czhyfa8i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wng1b161.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, aburgess@redhat.com, pedro@palves.net Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 12:06:52 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: aburgess@redhat.com, ssbssa@yahoo.de, pedro@palves.net, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com > > For the record, I did some testing using the gdb-12-branch, and unlike > Hannes, I wasn't able to reproduce. > > I tried in various scenarios: > - CMD windows > - ConEmu > - Cygwin terminal (there at least, I know it's not a real tty, FWIW). > > This was done on Windows Server 2016 (IIUC, this would correspond > to a version of Windows 10, verson 1607). > > Since Tom already tested the patch being proposed, other than > Pedro's question about the comment being removed, I'm OK with > the patch being pushed to both master and gdb-12-branch. Thanks. Andrew, would you please chime in and tell what you'd like to do with that comment? Whatever you decide, I will do that in the final commit.