From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9389 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2009 14:39:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 9378 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jun 2009 14:39:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:38:56 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KLW00L00JANM700@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:38:54 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.213.34]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KLW009AVJCSJ2X0@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:38:53 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:39:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/fullname.exp fix In-reply-to: <000001c9f5e4$676a0600$363e1200$@u-strasbg.fr> To: Pierre Muller Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83skhl4u83.fsf@gnu.org> References: <000501c9f12b$68c860e0$3a5922a0$@u-strasbg.fr> <200906210227.48175.pedro@codesourcery.com> <000301c9f28f$aa284220$fe78c660$@u-strasbg.fr> <000001c9f5e4$676a0600$363e1200$@u-strasbg.fr> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00761.txt.bz2 > From: "Pierre Muller" > Cc: , > Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:29:27 +0200 > > > So, on balance, I'd suggest to fix the testsuite not to expect this > > Posix semantics, at least not on DOS/Windows. > > Hi Eli, > > does that mean that I should make the change specific to Dos/Windows > targets? > I am not sure to know how to do that cleanly... Can it be done for all platforms? Did anyone object to doing so? > the purpose of the test is completely different anyhow. Sorry, I don't understand this part. Can you explain?