From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3311 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2010 18:04:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 3214 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2010 18:04:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:04:44 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZP00C003E3JJ00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:04:16 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.133.145]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZP00CPS3J3FI10@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:04:16 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:04:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA 3/5] Prec: x86 segment register support: target In-reply-to: <20100322145332.GA3061@caradoc.them.org> To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, teawater@gmail.com, msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83sk7sgrm3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4B9FCA21.9020904@vmware.com> <20100316200424.GA29097@caradoc.them.org> <201003221433.o2MEXt0J031478@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20100322145332.GA3061@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00766.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:53:35 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: teawater@gmail.com, msnyder@vmware.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:33:55PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Sorry, but I don't think adding these xx_base registers is a good > > idea. They are not acrhitected registers so they don't beling in the > > list of registers. > > What do you suggest instead? Would a separate command fit the bill? (The DJGPP build already has something similar, see "info dos ldt" and its description in the manual with an example of how to use it to display the DS segment base address and limit.)