From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-72055-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10501 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2010 17:54:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 10390 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2010 17:54:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 	tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:54:45 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0R00H00Y119K00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:53:10 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.74.198]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0R00GG5Z0ITI50@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:53:07 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:54:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Add -s option to source command.
In-reply-to: <o2he394668d1004121031gee9183c8g3aa53b249827c121@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83sk70y2uv.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20100406215751.7EC1784397@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <m3fx37uija.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <i2we394668d1004081549oede200ddkf7c8c51dde0dd8b1@mail.gmail.com> <8339z512xz.fsf@gnu.org> <s2oe394668d1004091023s8f2e484fq42d17ca1b0709860@mail.gmail.com> <83mxxczfha.fsf@gnu.org> <m2ve394668d1004091112t322e9f1ex44a294f7b7e6a275@mail.gmail.com> <83iq80zali.fsf@gnu.org> <j2ye394668d1004091249m78149f10ge00ed6470c3526cd@mail.gmail.com> <o2he394668d1004121031gee9183c8g3aa53b249827c121@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00374.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:31:34 -0700
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> [note: filenames.h uses the term "semi-absolute" for d:foo]
> I don't have an opinion on whether to treat d:/foo vs d:foo
> differently in this context.

I think they should be treated the same in this context.

Thanks.  The patch to filenames.h looks OK to me.