From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10930 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2011 16:10:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 10902 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Oct 2011 16:10:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:10:06 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LSU00500Y6GWN00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:10:04 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.91.138]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LSU005QIY8RVC10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:10:04 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:10:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] New test+use texinfo @click - @HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK@ [Re: doc build failure (Re: [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames)] In-reply-to: <20111010153049.GA11463@host1.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, uweigand@de.ibm.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83sjn0ygir.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201110101357.p9ADvmvK012977@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20111010145749.GA9444@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201110101615.39047.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20111010153049.GA11463@host1.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:30:49 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand , > eliz@gnu.org > > I can provide alternative less nifty graphical representation keeping the text > even with older texinfos. That'd be fine, but there's no good way in Texinfo to test for the version of makeinfo. So what exactly would be the condition for using the alternative?