From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16367 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2012 17:14:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 16339 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2012 17:14:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:13:49 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LXJ00N00JRC2300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:13:27 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.34.201]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LXJ0040MJUECJJ5@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:13:27 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:14:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [RFA] Have block_innermost_frame start from selected frame In-reply-to: <20120109071645.93E9F92BF6@kwai.gnat.com> To: Hilfinger@adacore.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83sjjoer47.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20111230215222.86B713FEE8@kwai.gnat.com> <8339c1td3u.fsf@gnu.org> <20120109071645.93E9F92BF6@kwai.gnat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 > From: Paul Hilfinger > CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 02:16:45 -0500 (EST) > > Eli, your actual comment was a question about whether the syntax > applied to watch (given that all the examples used print). On > consideration, I decided to keep things as they are What does this mean? what exactly did you leave unchanged? And do I need to review the doc patch again, or is it largely unchanged? Thanks.