From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28490 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2012 19:38:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 28482 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2012 19:38:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:38:13 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M5X00800L6UES00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:49 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M5X008LIL71CU30@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:37:49 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:38:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [patch] -iex and -ix: Execute them _after_ gdbinits In-reply-to: <20120620190124.GA21945@host2.jankratochvil.net> To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83sjdpdbac.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120616195417.GA6368@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83txybdnue.fsf@gnu.org> <20120616201312.GA7000@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83sjdvdkns.fsf@gnu.org> <20120616213126.GA12840@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83r4teejkj.fsf@gnu.org> <20120617065014.GA16029@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120620190124.GA21945@host2.jankratochvil.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00644.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:01:24 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > are you still against this patch to reach gdb-7.5 before it gets branched? I don't remember seeing any arguments to the contrary. If others disagree with me, I'd love to hear why. Specifically, why isn't it a good feature to be able to execute commands before loading .gdbinit?