From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-98559-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12970 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2013 19:05:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 12909 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2013 19:05:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:05:40 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MI900J00ZDKZE00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:05:38 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MI900JUPZPDW240@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:05:38 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:05:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc 6/8] record disas: omit function names by default
In-reply-to: <20130215183256.GA16845@host2.jankratochvil.net>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: markus.t.metzger@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, markus.t.metzger@gmail.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83sj4xs8hp.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <1360859352-30399-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1360859352-30399-7-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20130215161049.GA6219@host2.jankratochvil.net> <831uchtp4y.fsf@gnu.org> <20130215183256.GA16845@host2.jankratochvil.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00409.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:32:56 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: markus.t.metzger@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
>         markus.t.metzger@gmail.com
> 
> It is a "backtrace" into history, not into upper frames.
> 	(gdb) record backtrace 
> 	_IO_vsnprintf
> 	_IO_vfprintf_internal
> 	strchrnul
> 	_IO_vfprintf_internal
> 	__GI__IO_default_xsputn
> You can see _IO_vfprintf_internal called strchrnul which then returned back to
> _IO_vfprintf_internal.  This is not a real "backtrace".
> 
> I was already considering renaming the command as the term is a bit overloaded
> in the debugger context.
> 
> Maybe "record list-functions"?

How about "record trace-functions"?