Re: [PATCH] Teach -data-list-register-values to not include unavailable registers

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 20:54:10 +0800
> 
> This patch adds an option --skip-unavailable to MI command
> -data-list-register-values, so that unavailable registers are not
> displayed (on the context of traceframes).

"Skip unavailable" is double negation.  How about -show-available
instead?

> --- a/gdb/NEWS
> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ show range-stepping
>  
>    ** The new command -dprintf-insert sets a dynamic printf breakpoint.
>  
> +  ** The command -data-list-register-values now accepts an optional
> +     "--skip-unavailable" option.  When used, only available registers
> +     are displayed.                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"only the available"

>  Display the registers' contents.  @var{fmt} is the format according to
>  which the registers' contents are to be returned, followed by an optional
>  list of numbers specifying the registers to display.  A missing list of
> -numbers indicates that the contents of all the registers must be returned.
> +numbers indicates that the contents of all the registers must be
> +returned.  In the context of trace frames, the
> +@code{--skip-unavailable} option indicates that only available
> +(collected) registers are returned.
                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^
"are to be returned".  And why do you need the first part of that
sentence, about the "context of trace frames"?  Does it add anything
to the description?

Thanks.