From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31201 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2014 17:10:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31188 invoked by uid 89); 8 Apr 2014 17:10:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 17:10:29 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N3Q00I0025XSY00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:10:27 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N3Q00ILG2DEOA30@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 20:10:27 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 17:10:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix "PC register is not available" issue In-reply-to: <53442710.60104@redhat.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83sipn6937.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83txawa9wk.fsf@gnu.org> <20140318161608.GD4282@adacore.com> <83pplja2h9.fsf@gnu.org> <20140318165413.GE4282@adacore.com> <834n2kztfw.fsf@gnu.org> <53358C37.9050907@redhat.com> <83a9cafcpz.fsf@gnu.org> <5335B619.6040605@redhat.com> <8361myfa6l.fsf@gnu.org> <83ioqucrkw.fsf@gnu.org> <5342DBBC.4090500@redhat.com> <83lhvh6lqi.fsf@gnu.org> <5343DE45.5050707@redhat.com> <53442710.60104@redhat.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 17:42:56 +0100 > From: Pedro Alves > CC: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > I'd be very curious to see the backtrace you get > for the failing thread in your test case (I guess emacs?). Yes, it's Emacs. Do you mean the backtrace I see when debugging natively? Because when debugging Emacs with gdbserver, I cannot reproduce the problem with SuspendThread. > + /* We get Access Denied (5) when trying to suspend > + threads that Windows started on behalf of the > + debuggee, usually when those threads are just > + about to exit. */ > + if (err != ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED) > > I've shown above that whether it was Windows or the program > itself that started the threads is irrelevant, it'd be good to > reword this comment. OK. But now I'm confused: what is the conclusion from what you saw?