From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30528 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2014 09:46:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30517 invoked by uid 89); 17 Apr 2014 09:46:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout21.012.net.il Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:46:22 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N46005005EE3900@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:46:19 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N460054W5T60A60@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:46:19 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:46:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] Rename "gsmob" in Guile interface to "gdb object" In-reply-to: <87ioq8s3a4.fsf@igalia.com> To: Andy Wingo Cc: xdje42@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83sipci8zs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1397060028-18158-1-git-send-email-wingo@igalia.com> <1397060028-18158-6-git-send-email-wingo@igalia.com> <87ioq8s3a4.fsf@igalia.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00342.txt.bz2 > From: Andy Wingo > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:39:47 +0200 > > >> +The values exposed by @value{GDBN} to Guile are known as > >> +@dfn{@value{GDBN} objects}. There are several kinds of @value{GDBN} > >> +object, and each is disjoint from all other types known to Guile. > > > > objects > > You sure? I think Doug is right, although what you wrote is not entirely wrong, either. > "There are several kinds of GDB object, and..." sounds better > to me than "There are several kinds of GDB objects, and...". Maybe it > would be better to restructure the sentence; I tried a few other > formulations and all sounded worse. How about this: @value{GDBN} objects can be of several distinct types; each type is different from any other type known to Guile.