From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60147 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 14:38:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 60126 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2015 14:38:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout22.012.net.il Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:38:13 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NN700900PUEYQ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:38:11 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NN7009PUPZML690@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:38:11 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:38:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: 3 weeks to GDB 7.9.1 release? In-reply-to: <20150422143120.GJ4764@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83sibs2ppq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150422133231.GB4764@adacore.com> <83y4lk2ria.fsf@gnu.org> <20150422143120.GJ4764@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00825.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 07:31:20 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > Not really blocking, but would someone please help me get these > > annoyances fixed upstream, so that I don't need to continue fixing > > them in every GDB release? > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2015-03/msg00115.html > > IIUC (quick read only), you need libiberty patches to be pushed? > libiberty is owned by GCC, and so such pushes should just be pushed > to GCC's SVN first, and then can be backported to binutils-gdb... Yes, I know. That message had DJ Delorie CC'ed. > Do you have SVN write access to GCC? No. That's the problem, as the patches were already approved.