From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 96008 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2019 06:13:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 95986 invoked by uid 89); 9 Mar 2019 06:13:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 06:13:11 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2VEK-0005dY-ID; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 01:13:08 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3746 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h2VEJ-0002Zg-UW; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 01:13:08 -0500 Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 06:13:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83sgvw8tjv.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey CC: palves@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <87zhq5f5j3.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:57:36 -0700) Subject: Re: GDB 8.2.90 available for testing References: <20190227055112.4A5E782D7B@joel.gnat.com> <835zt3kbjf.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1hae23l.fsf@tromey.com> <835zstbyhb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhq5f5j3.fsf@tromey.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-03/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Tom Tromey , palves@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:57:36 -0700 > > I have played with the "nonl" code a bit and I can't seem to find an > approach that fixes this. We may have to revert that patch :( Maybe we should ask on bug-ncurses@gnu.org, perhaps Thomas Dickey will have some suggestion for dealing with this? If the only solution is to revert, we have nothing to lose, I think.