From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eliz@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7BF3844041
 for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Sat,  4 Jul 2020 18:19:14 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 4F7BF3844041
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eliz@gnu.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37970)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jrmkr-0008Je-Iq; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:19:13 -0400
Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2619 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jrmkq-0002ol-Le; Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:19:13 -0400
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 21:19:16 +0300
Message-Id: <83sge7ta6z.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <878sfztabt.fsf@esperi.org.uk> (message from Nick Alcock on Sat, 
 04 Jul 2020 19:16:22 +0100)
Subject: Re: libctf compilation failure on MinGW
References: <83y2o2vxm7.fsf@gnu.org> <878sfztabt.fsf@esperi.org.uk>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 18:19:30 -0000

> From: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 19:16:22 +0100
> 
> > GDB is about to branch for the imminent GDB 10.1 release, and
> > currently the problems I described back then are still with us.
> 
> Oh, I thought you pushed a fix already! Sorry!

We did, but only on the-then GDB 9.1 branch.  The master branch wasn't
changed, as we expected to have you update the upstream with the
proper solution.

> I'll post a fix sticking suitable E* #defines in once I get back from
> holiday on Tuesday.
> 
> > we'd like a solution soon, and need to decide whether to go with the
> > same workaround we used for GDB 9.1 or use a better change from you.
> 
> I think that workaround is in hindsight better than the change I
> proposed, and should go in trunk. :/

Thanks.