From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id pmdpJnyzvmDfTgAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 20:02:04 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8E7C51F163; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 20:02:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BEB1E939 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 20:02:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AD4393A414 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 00:02:03 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 83AD4393A414 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1623110523; bh=fe3ARH99IYMTkLP/meqZno7hI7U6J0t0SyMNO0nPhpU=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=VGkavwq4M6MNBggwAKA3JyjKtO2sSxwQmbwN/8VXtakn4dcD/FjMT8AV59D7b9qGt pxHdiMPAx7IB3wdmAAsyC0wOyYsZgf/p0S4oyyUvitE52azr0/ACSbChWJpBjO44G2 N0WMbSMih8FG+yO7BcuJwb8G0kU3lsMppORogojM= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAC4385BF9E for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 00:01:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DEAC4385BF9E Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39228) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqPBJ-0006bN-G0; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 20:01:21 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1656 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqGIK-00042l-1t; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 10:32:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 17:31:54 +0300 Message-Id: <83sg1tg2zp.fsf@gnu.org> To: Tom Tromey In-Reply-To: <87k0n5n47d.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:23:50 -0600) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gnulib: import chown References: <20210529172510.16285-1-vapier@gentoo.org> <87k0n5n47d.fsf@tromey.com> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > From: Tom Tromey > Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 08:23:50 -0600 > > >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Frysinger via Gdb-patches writes: > > Mike> A few sims use this to emulate chown syscalls. > > Looks good. AFAICT, the Gnulib emulation always returns a failure status in the MinGW port, is that okay for the callers of chown? Perhaps a better alternative is to silently do nothing on MS-Windows?