From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4197 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2009 19:00:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 4164 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jul 2009 19:00:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:59:57 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KM600M004IE0500@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:59:54 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.194.175]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KM600J184RK6VD0@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:59:45 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:00:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Move the multi-forks support to the generic multi-inferiors support. In-reply-to: <200907021533.32051.pedro@codesourcery.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, msnyder@vmware.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83r5wy3o7z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <200905310013.38916.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200907011927.59624.pedro@codesourcery.com> <83y6r82p08.fsf@gnu.org> <200907021533.32051.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:33:31 +0100 > Cc: msnyder@vmware.com > > Okay. Let me know what you think of the new hunks (gdb.texinfo and NEWS) > below. gdb.texinfo is fine. I have a couple of comments for NEWS: > + Although support availability still depends on target support, the "support" used twice in the same sentence. How about losing the first instance? > + command set has been uniformalised. The GNU/Linux specific ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ We use the US spelling, with a z, not s. But I think "command set is more uniform now" is a better way of saying the same and avoid the problem in the first place. Okay with those changes. Thanks.