From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-83089-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9655 invoked by alias); 17 Aug 2011 20:38:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 9633 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Aug 2011 20:38:56 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:38:40 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LQ300B009S7K200@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:38:38 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.168.102]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LQ30086KAOD0581@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:38:38 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:38:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Some Python ideas, looking for feedback
In-reply-to: <20110817203525.6d789493@ado-gentoo>
To: Andrew Oakley <andrew@ado.is-a-geek.net>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83r54jsrhs.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D583A2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <201108161345.33448.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0151D585D2@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> <20110817193710.59945561@ado-gentoo> <20110817201316.64fc14e5@ado-gentoo> <83sjozsuor.fsf@gnu.org> <20110817203525.6d789493@ado-gentoo>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00349.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:35:25 +0100
> From: Andrew Oakley <andrew@ado.is-a-geek.net>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> "Fixed" version:
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> index 6e7bf52..c82173b 100644
> --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> @@ -21575,7 +21575,8 @@ Each field is an object, with some pre-defined
> attributes: @item bitpos
>  This attribute is not available for @code{static} fields (as in
>  C@t{++} or Java).  For non-@code{static} fields, the value is the bit
> -position of the field.
> +position of the field.  For @code{enum} fields, the value is the
> +enumeration member's integer representation.

This version is fine, thanks.