Re: set print object on should affect MI varobjs (PR mi/13393)

xgsa
2012-03-30T21:26:10Z

31.03.2012, 00:52, "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>:
> Close, but not quite there yet. б The last piece we need to clarify is
> the "actual (derived) type of the object is set" part. б What do you
> mean by "type is set"? б This text describes the result returned by
> '-var-create', so did you mean to say that the actual type is
> mentioned in the tuple returned by this operation? б IOW, did you mean
> to point out that the 'type=TYPE' part of -var-create's output will
> mention the actual type as TYPE?

Yes, it is exactly what I meant. Can you help me with the better wording?

Thanks,
Anton.