Re: set print object on should affect MI varobjs (PR mi/13393)

xgsa
2012-03-30T20:25:45Z

>> +would be printed by the @value{GDBN} CLI. Note that if
>> +@samp{set print object} setting is set the @emph{actual} (derived) type
>> +of the object is set rather than @emph{declared} one.
> "setting is set" is not right. I actually don't understand what you
> tried to say; if you explain your intent, I will suggest a better
> wording.
I meant that "set print object on/off" will also affect the "type" field
returned by -var-create and -var-list-children.
Probably, it should be an "option" not "setting". The result will look
like this:

+would be printed by the @value{GDBN} CLI. Note that if
+@samp{set print object} option is set the @emph{actual} (derived) type
+of the object is set rather than @emph{declared} one.

Is it ok?
>> +The type of the child. Note that if @samp{set print object} setting is
> ^^
> Two spaces here, please.
Fixed.

P.S. I have also found a mistake in my gdb/doc/Changelog. It should be
"-var-create and -var-list-children" instead of "-var-create and
-var-update". Fixed.

Anton.