Re: set print object on should affect MI varobjs (PR mi/13393)

Eli Zaretskii
2012-03-30T18:01:09Z

> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:07:59 +0200
> From: xgsa <xgsa@yandex.ru>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org

Sorry for a long response time.

> +would be printed by the @value{GDBN} CLI. Note that if
> +@samp{set print object} setting is set the @emph{actual} (derived) type
> +of the object is set rather than @emph{declared} one.

"setting is set" is not right. I actually don't understand what you
tried to say; if you explain your intent, I will suggest a better
wording.

> +The type of the child. Note that if @samp{set print object} setting is
^^
Two spaces here, please.

> +set the @emph{actual} (derived) type of the object is set rather than
> +@emph{declared} one.

Here you have the same problem as above ("setting is set" and
generally unclear intent).

Thanks.