From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3668 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2012 07:44:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 3658 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2012 07:44:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il (HELO mtaout21.012.net.il) (80.179.55.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:44:22 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M5N00G00EB4KW00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:44:20 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M5N00GHZETWJK50@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:44:20 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:44:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc]: Rename Index node to prevent file collision In-reply-to: To: Michael Hope Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, joseph@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83r4thf296.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4FD94EC0.1000009@linaro.org> <83ehphyhdn.fsf@gnu.org> <20120614220037.GO18729@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00500.txt.bz2 > From: Michael Hope > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:27:05 +1200 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , "Joseph S. Myers" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > I haven't checked, but is there a command-line option to force > > that behavior? > > Not in makeinfo 4.13b. There's been discussion upstream before about > this with no conclusion: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2008-12/msg00012.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2010-11/msg00033.html Patrice Dumas is the developer of the replacement for makeinfo, so I guess you can expect the solution he liked in that thread when the next version of Texinfo is out.