From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-98690-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19424 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2013 18:44:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 19405 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2013 18:44:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HDRS_LCASE_1K,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il (HELO mtaout23.012.net.il) (80.179.55.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:44:09 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MIJ00G007VW8M00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:43:02 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MIJ00FWU7ZQYW90@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:43:02 +0200 (IST)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:44:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC - Python Scripting] New method gdb.Architecture.disassemble
In-reply-to: <CAGyQ6gy-QUEEGzL4Li905hsbx5zpYD0LPa3+q-AH42qyJMpXBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83r4kaomgr.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAGyQ6gy_08hZn2Pk6pmD+AuOkH7SCsQ6732KTa7sucZ7-4prUA@mail.gmail.com> <20753.38272.55066.651097@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <CAGyQ6gy68LdCd_qxDX7vinMg-Pb6qnukGScOw2uzgezxKxh_TA@mail.gmail.com> <CADPb22TGJNFg7VJkeoTB7Ctd=K2Tc490LKo_mdUVXFF2K6TV5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAGyQ6gweW=9L4mVCkFetd+LvvpjSYzYKM78mYDu5HfG1LpVwiQ@mail.gmail.com> <87txphmdt3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <CAGyQ6gzSs617BRcreAGA5418EpXaqCaPN8ZzKjQYNx9yxDSJRA@mail.gmail.com> <87r4kkks5g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <CAGyQ6gwSnFH3OKHSpNxVmVxRRRM61c=T=euhJg6hyFL7+88ecg@mail.gmail.com> <20763.64197.459891.627211@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <CAGyQ6gxOqnD0tr+rR2kuYBr6ub6vN8DvGG5PxA+BO-O8VYXVqA@mail.gmail.com> <20765.55532.700460.792597@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <CAGyQ6gxX7r9QWY+ze9kzyjAwqCf9-kTmor2JRFAoW1mx=x47Kw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGyQ6gzmBtx4AO=Md8_Bzj9Nqkd0iPXhLGOkBPe0Zi-DPD0cGg@mail.gmail.com> <83a9r4sl04.fsf@gnu.org> <CAGyQ6gyAwQpBJ41bOtvQOGKM+OM+7eKQ1TVdTC7-G3O1RG0Geg@mail.gmail.com> <83k3q4p8bu.fsf@gnu.org> <CAGyQ6gy-QUEEGzL4Li905hsbx5zpYD0LPa3+q-AH42qyJMpXBA@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00540.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:34:23 -0800
> From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> One can specify all three arguments.  Does the description anywhere
> >> indicate otherwise?
> >
> > The text does not describe that possibility at all, so I assumed that
> > it cannot happen.
> 
> How does the attached patch look?

Looks good, thanks.