From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29280 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2013 18:53:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29271 invoked by uid 89); 9 Apr 2013 18:53:05 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:53:04 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ML000L004DTH100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:52:57 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ML000K404G8SFE0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 21:52:57 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 00:48:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] Display configuration details in --help In-reply-to: <51645982.8050904@redhat.com> To: Pedro Alves Cc: dje@google.com, tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83r4ija63u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r4jaynqq.fsf@gnu.org> <514B4AC3.1090103@redhat.com> <83zjxwy4ux.fsf@gnu.org> <20130321191051.GF5447@adacore.com> <83r4j8y1kh.fsf@gnu.org> <20130321203919.GG5447@adacore.com> <87r4j8zd0k.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83ehf85u7x.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqsbadfe.fsf@gnu.org> <20836.17485.525118.795474@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <83txnfa9m7.fsf@gnu.org> <51645982.8050904@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:10:10 +0100 > From: Pedro Alves > CC: Eli Zaretskii , Tom Tromey , > Joel Brobecker , > gdb-patches > > >>> The options here are (mostly) sorted alphabetically. > >> > >> Except where they aren't: > > There's a pattern. Yes, and I tried to follow it. > I'd suggest either right after --version; right after --help; right > before --core, or a wholesale reevaluation of the current grouping > (either sort all alphabetically, or break "Options:" into groups). Right after --version is what I did in my patch.