From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30655 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2013 15:20:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30644 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2013 15:20:17 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:20:16 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MR200400D87SD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:20:06 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MR2004ATD9HSI00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:20:06 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:20:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: gdbserver allows for subsequent and not for additional connections. In-reply-to: <87fvuo9nzb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> To: Tom Tromey Cc: sanimir.agovic@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83r4e8w4er.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1375694633-30275-1-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com> <83txj4w5m7.fsf@gnu.org> <0377C58828D86C4588AEEC42FC3B85A71764728F@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> <87fvuo9nzb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00148.txt.bz2 > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , > "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" > Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 09:06:00 -0600 > > >> > old> By default, gdbserver keeps the listening TCP port open, so that > >> > additional connections are possible. > >> > ^^^^^^^^^^ > >> > > >> > new> By default, gdbserver keeps the listening TCP port open, so that > >> > subsequent connections are possible. > >> > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > Eli> Is it really such a significant difference? I'm not sure. > > Sanimir> Well, I agree that it might be personal taste, hence I will > Sanimir> drop the patch. > > I think it is an improvement. > > I think "additional" here implies multiple simultaneous connections -- > in fact, what confused you in the first place. "Subsequent" makes this > differentiation clear. Fine with me, feel free to install. Thanks.