From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16226 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2014 08:07:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16215 invoked by uid 89); 21 Feb 2014 08:07:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:07:09 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1C005006AMCC00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:07:07 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1C005IJ6JU2B60@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:07:07 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:07:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [Windows]Fix a bug which cause GDB.exe assert when try to run the inferior In-reply-to: <530706DD.8060605@codesourcery.com> To: Yao Qi Cc: asmwarrior@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83r46w51ok.fsf@gnu.org> References: <530612A8.4000903@gmail.com> <5306A9BC.4080701@codesourcery.com> <5306EE2A.2060103@gmail.com> <5306FA43.1070408@codesourcery.com> <83sirc532m.fsf@gnu.org> <530706DD.8060605@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00682.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:57:17 +0800 > From: Yao Qi > CC: , > > On 02/21/2014 03:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:03:31 +0800 > >> From: Yao Qi > >> CC: > >> > >> 2014-02-21 Yuanhui Zhang > >> > >> * windows-nat.c (windows_xfer_shared_libraries): Return > >> TARGET_XFER_EOF if LEN is zero. > > > > Indeed. May I also suggest to point to the details of the underlying > > problem, or include its summary, in the ChangeLog entry? > > > > I prefer to put the details of the underlying problem in commit log, > but I am fine to include its summary in the ChangeLog entry. > > How about this? Looks good to me, thanks.