From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 5cFuFGsRuWOWZxEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 01:30:03 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 417EF1E222; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 01:30:03 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=D5LeTVi2; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3E3D1E112 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 01:30:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0676E3858C53 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 06:30:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0676E3858C53 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1673073002; bh=2plwLktfbSAvmI1w+d9wj7Af/TYw4MTi4m6sqCE31NQ=; h=Date:To:In-Reply-To:Subject:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=D5LeTVi2UZDsJ6HL3wpNiu7f7t/WESRMw/FLzDaoZ3bVP5txCdrph7z60hggiwXXq 234ASnyFqF+RPmk6bP9Sni9oUbdRn8o00XgJihcmnV/mVSjI6EX8uQZDx/6Mj3g/Bk amQxl7TbCj/86XEkOCLrZ7xOsYcIeaHHuw9o8WHg= Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FE4C3858D33 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 06:29:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6FE4C3858D33 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pE2i6-00089a-7i for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 01:29:42 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pE2i5-0003Q9-9r for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 01:29:41 -0500 Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 08:30:02 +0200 Message-Id: <83r0w6uaad.fsf@gnu.org> To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <83h6xugc5v.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches on Sat, 17 Dec 2022 19:42:04 +0200) Subject: Re: Two observations using GDB 13 snapshot References: <83h6xugc5v.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" > Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2022 19:42:04 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches > > Using the latest snapshot of GDB 13 (MinGW build on native Windows), I > see some strange behavior I've not seen with previous versions: > > . Very long time to read symbols. E.g., reading symbols of its own > binary takes a whopping 2 minutes. GDB 12.1 does the same in > under 10 seconds. > > . The (top-gdb) prompt doesn't appear when debugging GDB with > itself. > > Are these bugs or features? With the first issue basically solved, what about the other one? Can someone tell me why "(top-gdb)" no longer shows, ot suggest where to look for the reason?